• Choose something that interests you. What do you read or watch for fun? What do you follow on social media?
• Avoid "exhausted" topics. Show some mercy to your readers and listeners.
• Choose a topic that allows you to keep an open mind. If you already have a strong opinion, then it will be difficult to fairly present all viewpoints.
• Bounce ideas off friends, family, and teachers. Really listen to their feedback.
• Look at news stories in traditional and social media. What's trending and interesting?
• Lighten up on the subject matter. Avoid the shocking and really sad stuff. Aim for a pleasant experience!
• Use a note app or keep a handy notepad to quickly write down ideas when they come to you.
Books and specialized reference collections are often a better and more efficient approach to learning about important issues. Consider these advantages:
Big Picture - Books are often the best way to understand how a topic fits into the larger context of an issue. They can help you visualize how all of the pieces of a research puzzle fit together.
Terminology - Books offer a great introduction to subject vocabulary (search terms) and to the most influential people, places, and things associated with a topic. Think about it; you can't expect to find relevant information about a topic if you don't know what search terms appear in the published literature.
Citation Mining - Books contain lists of additional sources related to your topic. Bibliographies are like maps; they often lead to the best and most respected primary and secondary sources about a topic.
You do not have to read an entire book to use it as a research source! Just focus on the relevant chapters or specific pages, then format your citation accordingly.
When beginning a topic investigation, reading 15 pages from a book or encyclopedia with a broad context is often better than reading 15 pages from a journal article with a narrow focus.
Specialized databases and websites about national and international issues are good places to get topic ideas. They explain issues within larger contexts and from differing viewpoints. This helps with understanding the "big picture" and with ideas for narrowing topics.
Why is it that so many Professors frown upon the use of Wikipedia?
Although some people within the Wikipedia community fastidiously monitor and fact check various subject areas, by and large anyone can add content. This is problematic because the information - even if it is both factual and credible - in many cases cannot be verified by the Professor.
The American Journalism Review states:
"...the primary knock against Wikipedia is that its authors and editors are also its users — an unpaid, partially anonymous army, some of whom insert jokes, exaggeration and even outright lies in their material. About one-fifth of the editing is done by anonymous users, but a tight-knit community of 600 to 1,000 volunteers does the bulk of the work, according to Wikipedia cofounder Jimmy Wales. Members of this group can delete material or, in extreme cases, even lock particularly outrageous entries while they are massaged"
So while the controversy rages on, the best piece of advice is DO NOT CITE Wikipedia articles in your research; however, Wikipedia (much like Google) is often a great place to gather basic information as well as offers fertile ground for acquiring keywords to use in vetted subscription databases.